This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are used for visitor analysis, others are essential to making our site function properly and improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Click Accept to consent and dismiss this message or Deny to leave this website. Read our Privacy Statement for more.
I was just notified by my billing company that one of our major private carriers (UHC) is bundling the 36902 code with 36581 for all their patients. Thus they are denying the 36902. Has anyone else run into this problem and how did you resolve it. I have scheduled a physician to physician conference call with the medical director to express my disagreement with there ruling. I would love to hear anyone else’s similar experience.
36902 is specific to fistulagram with angioplasty of the peripheral AV access.
When doing a fibrin sheath disruption, the most appropriate code would be 36595 unless you could demonstrate that there was not only a fibrin sheath but also a central venous stenosis, in which case the appropriate code would be 37248 (central venous angioplasty from a non-dialysis access circuit).
Of note -- if you were doing a fistulagram and only found a flow limiting central venous stenosis that required intervention, the 36902 code would not be appropriate as that code is specific for an angiogram with angioplasty of the peripheral segment of the dialysis access. In this case -- you would code 36901 (angiogram of the dialysis access circuit) and the add-on code, 36907 (angioplasty of the central segment of the dialysis circuit/central veins since the approach is from the dialysis circuit).
Although this is the correct coding, please keep in mind, the new add-on codes (36907-36909) are only fully reimbursable in the extension of practice setting and not reimbursable in the ASC setting (other than the professional component)
Posted Tuesday, April 10, 2018