This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are used for visitor analysis, others are essential to making our site function properly and improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Click Accept to consent and dismiss this message or Deny to leave this website. Read our Privacy Statement for more.
Print Page | Sign In | Join Now
ASDIN Physician Blog
Blog Home All Blogs
Search all posts for:   

 

View all (199) posts »
 

Emergency Consenting

Posted By Nephrology Associates PA Vascular Access Center, Wednesday, November 15, 2017

In the event we cannot get consent from a patient, their spouse, guardian or other legal entity, we have had the ordering physician, typically their dialysis Nephrologist that ordered the procedure, and the Interventional Nephrologist who is going to perform the procedure discuss the situation, decide it was in the patient's best interest to have the procedure performed and sign the consent.

 

I have looked online for emergency consent guidelines however most deal with blood transfusions, minors and don't relate to our situation.  I have found this verbage on several documents:

 

An emergency must meet all of the following criteria:

a) The patient's life or health must be in immediate and substantial danger.

b) The patient is incapable of consenting.

c) Any potential risks associated with the treatment are materially outweighed by the

potential benefits associated with treatment.

 

So my question is what do you do in these situations? 

How many signatures do you require on your consent forms if any?

Do you have any P&P's you would be willing to share?

 

Thank you in advance for your help,

 

Nicole Davis

Tags:  Consents  Emergency  Policy and Procedure 

Permalink | Comments (0)